Some people who use a big amount to gamble on a goal always believe that the higher they risk, the higher the profit they will get if the game enters as they plan; they forget that the more they risk, the more they will lose, and when that winning they are craving for finally comes, it can't be enough to cover up what they have been risking all this while. Gambling with an amount we can afford is not enough; we should all learn how to manage that amount wisely.

If you have passed KYC already, it will make it different, but if your account is frequently discovered to log in from areas that don't match your country, it will make them ask for further verification even if you are using a VPN, and that further verification will bring them to the notice that you are in a restricted country.

I think it's too early to appreciate the US government for such. Trump just made the statement, and I have not seen any legal moves towards that being achieved, so we should wait for action to be taken first before we start appreciating them. Politicians are not to be trusted by their words alone, especially when it's something that has to do with giving the seated government more revenue.

Viewing every bet with an equal risk level is a practice that has not only helped many manage the bankroll properly, but it has also saved them from being emotionally traumatized as a result of putting too much confidence in a particular game which ends up disappointing them.

If we don't spend time with someone who is addicted, we won't know how to help them, and it's only when we know how they react and what can work for them that we can proceed with an option, but what the man described in the OP plans to do is a very hard thing and can cause more damage to the person than the help he's trying to render.

We all gamble the same way; we have to reduce the amount we spend in one spin in order to increase the number of times we can go for the little budget we have, and the spin with a little amount can give us what one high stake on sport can't give us. We are also likely to lose it in a slot compared to the level of winning chances we have in sports betting.

I share the same thoughts with you; when we talk about something too much in this crypto industry, it always turns out for such not to come to pass the way we expect of it, and even CZ, who made that tweet, is unsure and understands how the market works. The chances of it happening are slim; we might just see a little market push up, but not as high as many are bullish about it.

You are correct since Bitcoin doesn't guarantee fast profit; coming to invest in it with the hope of getting profit quickly will be very disappointing for anyone who has that mentality. Before investing in Bitcoin, sometimes their time of investing might even be the time when the market will start settling, reducing their capital firsthand, which will shift their attention into looking for means to regain what has been left in their portfolio rather than the profit they were expecting.

Some have changed their mind because of what people have said about something which might have been a good thing to some of them and at the same time a bad thing to the ones whom it could have favoured, but anyone who wants to go into any form of business is not supposed to just be reliant on getting information and data from one source; they should be able to go into the market and do a survey themselves in order for them to decide on what to do and what not to do. What works for Mr A most times might not work for B; the same is also applicable in reverse.

The rate just be like watin don settle for 1460 even sometimes eh fit just drop to 1458 before few hours if we check back rate again eh don go back to the 1460+ make we see now way December selling pressure don reduce if eh fit some how reach 1490 again since the last time I see am for that rate nah about 4 months ago if I no mistake.